FW: SIGSEGV with Nessus 2.0.10a?
Hugo van der Kooij
hugo.van.der.kooij at qi.nl
Tue Feb 3 11:23:15 EST 2004
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 04:32:24PM +0100, Hugo van der Kooij wrote:
> > I just noticed a scan was incomplete due to a large number of SIGSEGV
errors
> > in the nessus messages log. The software was installed recently from the
RPM
> > files of atrpms:
> >
> > Packages:
> > libnessus-2.0.10a-11.rhfc1.at
> > nessus-2.0.10a-14.rhfc1.at
> > nessus-server-2.0.10a-14.rhfc1.at
> > libnasl-2.0.10a-15.rhfc1.at
> > nasl-2.0.10a-15.rhfc1.at
> >
> > Is this a known limitation?
> I hope not. Could you rpm -V the packages? Perhaps the notorious
> prelinking rpm corruption?
The machine is a standard up2date FC1 machine. (No testing packages.)
The command did not show anything odd. Just a load of updated NASL scripts.
But that brings me to the issue I had with the nessus-plugins-update script.
It failed to update because wget inside the script added an .1 to the
filename which did not occur when I did the exact same wget command from the
commandline. I added a mv command to get rid of the .1 added to the file it
downloaded.
I noticed some of the nasl scripts are in unix format and some in dos
format. Might this have any impact?
Hugo.
--
Axel.Thimm at physik.fu-berlin.de
More information about the Nessus
mailing list