On Oct 5, 2005, at 9:16 AM, Renaud Deraison wrote: <snip stuff about performance> This sounds quite nice. Nessus has always been a fast scanner for me (save in a few situations that I don't blame it for being slow) and it's nice to see that it will be even lighter on the machine.
Could you go into some of the reasons why this license change is taking effect? I'm sure that "business reasons" were involved in it, but if you can, I would like to hear more detailed reasons. If there are some technical or licensing reasons, I would be interested as well, as I know there are sometimes functionalities that would greatly improve a product that you cannot simply include because they belong to someone else. I don't want to sound like an open source zealot, because i use plenty of closed source software, but I really do enjoy my security products to be open as much as possible. This reassures me greatly that I am getting a product that I can hand verify if I need to. It means that I don't have to trust Tenable... I can look at the code myself. I've not had to do that very much, but on occasion it has been handy.
I do not envy your support headache. Having supported a variety of unixes, I know that developing for many of them can be quite challenging. I am also guessing that the plugins will remain open for viewing at least, if not open source (I think most of them are though). If this is not the case, I would certainly like to know about it. I am also guessing that the policy compliance plugins may not be open for viewing. Doug Nordwall Pacific Northwest National Lab |